Sustainable Agriculture Information Network

Deutsch | English | Español
Sustainet Sustainet Sustainet
Home
Project
Principles
Results
Networks
Self-evaluation
Writeshops
Analysis matrix
Information Office
Links
Contact

Results – Instrument analysis matrix

A fourth instrument is an analysis matrix for evaluating the scaling-up potential of good practices. The Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape and Land Use Research (ZALF) devised this semi-quantitative analysis and evaluation matrix on the basis of the self-evaluations. To develop the matrix, a broad range of factors was identified which might influence the success of a scaling up process. These factors were subdivided into six categories:

Category 1: Features of good agricultural practices (GAPs)

The definitive criterion for scaling up of good practices is their cost-benefit ratio and their poverty-reducing impact. Beyond this, the extent to which good practices are adapted to local social, cultural, environmental and economic conditions is of crucial importance.

Successful scaling up also requires the technical application of a good practice to be straightforward and allow the possibility of low-cost "trial" applications. The practice must be highly flexible when transferred to a different context.

Category 2: Characteristics of the implementing organisations

It is a prerequisite for broad-scale dissemination of good agricultural practices that the implementing organisations have sound professional knowledge of the project. Equally they must possess good local agriculture skills and engage in effective networking with partner organisations. A relationship of mutual trust must be built up between the partners, and all parties must be actively involved in the process.

Category 3: Interest and capacity of the target group

Any successful scaling up of good practices hinges on the farmers' receptiveness to innovation. The farmers who are most willing to adopt new practices have proved to be those with the greatest need to improve their living conditions in the wake of some kind of crisis.

Category 4: Political and institutional framework conditions

The scaling up of good agricultural practices depends greatly on the level of political will at national and at local level. It is important that support given through political channels is precisely targeted to meet the needs of smallholders. The legal framework conditions also have a strong influence. For example, laws on access to land and water or subsidy policies may be a help or, in some cases, a definite hindrance to the scaling up of good practices. At local level, local governments and stakeholder groups can exert considerable influence over the rapid scaling up of good practices.

Category 5: Economic framework conditions

Alongside the political framework conditions, the successful scaling up of good practices also depends critically on the economic framework conditions. Relevant factors include a well-developed infrastructure, effective access to markets, and the involvement of private-sector entrepreneurs.

Category 6: Management of the scaling-up process: planning, dissemination and sustainability

A scaling up strategy for good agricultural practices calls for detailed, timely and flexible planning and monitoring. For instance, the target group must be properly defined, and the right means of communication chosen to educate and inform them about the new practices. The scaling up of information must be adapted to local conditions. During the planning of broad-scale dissemination of good practices, it is important to have mapped out the financial framework and for the partners to have agreed on the participatory structures for decision-making.

Sustainet –
a cooperative project
to combat world hunger
through sustainable
agriculture

   | Sitemap | Imprint